age of empires 2 validating subscription

A little fact, some fiction, and a good deal of embellishment are all thrown into the mix, which in turn excites the audience and turns a profit for the maker. The makers main objective is usually to make money. That said, TV and games are rarely good representations of history.

An example would be a research report not citing any primary sources.Īs you get further from the primary source, more errors and bias are introduced into the work.

Tertiary sources are compilations of multiple secondary sources. An example would be a thesis using primary sources as sources for the work. These are written much later than the event. Secondary sources are basically compilations of multiple primary sources. It was written at the time of or soon after the event(s) occurred. Histories, for example, is a primary source. Primary sources are the originals from the time of the event. Especially to an amateur like me who likes history, how can we avoid such things?įirst off, the study of history is composed of three basic types of sources. My question: the source we are collecting information from most of the time is hiding information or showing incorrect info. In Civilization, there is information abut civilizations that are missing and there are questions about why they specified such people. For example, Call of Duty in some series points out how the Nazis were bad and Hitler should be killed. However, I discovered that games in general gives you specific information in order to achieve the game purpose. However, there is a game called Civilisation that is really really into history and goes into various detailed things about every civilization.

Other games, like Call of Duty or other shooter games, talk about history as well. It was the first game that gave me some info about history, such as the different eras and some knowledge about civilizations.

When I was a kid, I played a game called Age of Empires. I didn't study history at a university, but at first TV, such as National Geographic, and later games were my sources of collecting information. How can I be sure that the source that I am learning history from is the correct source? Maybe (or most of the time) this source is hiding information or neglecting it. You can learn and understand history various ways such as learning in a university, reading books, being taught by someone with a background in history, watching TV, browsing the internet, or, in my case, (and my question) from games.

Age of empires 2 validating subscription